When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2014. 12. 26경 14:58경부터 1시간여 동안 제주시 C에 있는 D 정형외과 병원 앞에서, 불특정 다수의 행인들이 지나가는 동안 “D 원장님! 다시 걷게 해 주세요!! 2013년 11월 8일 MRI 검사 한다니까 원장님 맘대로 동의서도 안 받고 관절경 했잖아요. 아파서 죽겠다니까 2~3일이면 괜찮아진다고 했잖아요. 그 담엔 일주일이면 괜찮아진다. 그 담엔 보름이면 괜찮아진다. 그 담엔 한 달 가는 경우도 있다 하고. 이제 와서 이런 경우 없었다구요 제 다리는 도대체 언제 되돌아오나요 제 다리가 160만 원 짜리인가요 “라고 적힌 두꺼운 종이를 목에 피켓으로 걸고 1인 시위를 함으로써 공연히 사실을 적시하여 피해자의 명예를 훼손하였다.

In addition, from January 15, 2015 to January 15, 2015, the Defendant, as indicated in the list of crimes, has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts by making one person of the aforementioned methods nine times in total, as shown in the list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (No. 9 and 16 No. 16 of the evidence list);

1. Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel regarding the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, even though the Defendant was subject to a face-to-face inspection at the victim’s operating hospital and was unable to properly use the bridge due to such legacy, the victim did not appear to have a sexual attitude for recovery from damage, such as failing to meet the Defendant, and thus, committed an act as stated in its decision in favor of the victim.