beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.11.09 2016고정308

업무방해

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is the representative director of E Co., Ltd. and the president of the Gangnam branch of the above Diplomatic Department, who is the franchise store business of the Diplomatic Department and who is the director of the Diplomatic Department.

From June 24, 2014 to June 23, 2015, the Defendant entered into a franchise store agreement with the victim F and the fourth floor of the G building in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu to operate the “Danesthesia pain Department”, a member store of the victim E, a stock company, and the victim operated the “Danesthesia pain Department Department and Subdivision Department” until June 23, 2015, which is the date on which the contract is concluded.

After the end of the contract, the victim was operating the hospital by changing only the name into the “H pain Department” without changing the name from the same place to the “Danesthesia Department,” but the Defendant, on the website (I), was in the process of transferring the “Danesthesia pain Department” to the “Danesthesia pain Department” and was in the process of transferring the “Danesthesia pain Department” to the “Danesthesia History Department”, and was in mind to prevent the customers visiting the above website from visiting the “Hology Department,” by posting the same article as the place where the above “Hology” is operated is being a construction work, making it impossible to use it impossible.

Accordingly, around June 24, 2015, the Defendant posted a letter "I am for the Representative Director of Online Counseling" of the Internet homepage (I), "I am for the purpose of using it as of the present time due to the expansion transfer, and I am for 150 square meters to three minutes from the market trade during July, I am for the following reasons: (a) from around that time to November 3, 2015, I am for the same writing as written in the list of crimes in the annexed sheet; and (b) let customers visiting the above Internet site move the hospital operated by the victim to another place; and (c) so I am for the purpose of not doing business at present.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's hospital operation by fraudulent means.

2. (1) The witness’s testimony at this Court is examined.