However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 00:07 on September 2, 2016, the Defendant driven a vehicle with a bscopisisco at a level of about 200 meters alcohol level of about 0.134% in the 200-meter radius from the front road of the Dong-dong, Mang-dong, Mang-dong, Mangdong, to the front road of the restaurant in which he/she must do so.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) operated the vehicle on the road, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, from approximately 15 km section to the front of the restaurant in the front of the restaurant in the front of the front of the 15km drive from the date and time unfolding as stated in the foregoing paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act that choose a penalty, Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. To take into account the following factors: The reason behind sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is against the order to provide community service and attend lectures; the fact that there are two times the same records of drinking driving; the drinking value and the distance of driving and the circumstances leading to an insurance failure