2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. The Plaintiff is a student who was enrolled in the fourth and fourth grade of the D Middle School in 2016.

B. On May 20, 2016, the Plaintiff thought that E, who is a teachers of Pyeongtaek-gu office, made an examination of a teacher in the Kakakao Kakao Kakao Kakao Kakao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Ka

또한 원고는 위 카카오톡 단체채팅방에서 같은 반 친구 H이 담임교사에 대하여 ‘I’, ‘J’라고 비방할 때 ‘K!’, ‘L!’라고 담임교사의 이름으로 운을 띄우고 H이 쓴 내용에 ‘와!!!’라고 동조하였다.

C. On May 31, 2016, the D Middle School Guidance Committee (hereinafter “D Middle School Guidance Committee”) deliberated on the disciplinary action against the above teachers by mixing them with bathing in the same place as the Plaintiff, etc., and passed a resolution on two days of suspension of attendance against the Plaintiff.

On June 1, 2016, the Defendant issued a disposition to suspend the Plaintiff from attending (from June 7, 2016 to June 8, 2016) (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

E. The Defendant did not recognize the Plaintiff’s attendance during the period of suspension of attendance pursuant to the validity of the instant disposition and stated two days without permission in the Plaintiff’s school life records.

F. The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed an administrative appeal with the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education Administrative Appeals, but the said administrative appeals commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s appeal on October 12, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, 3, 8, Eul evidence 1 to 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the main defense of this case

A. The defendant's assertion of this case does not have any legal interest to seek its revocation due to the completion of its execution.