However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 23, 2016, the Defendant seems to be in writing on April 23, 2016, around 10:15, and around 22:15 on April 23, 2016.

At the front parking lot of the D in Sungsung-si, “A person under the influence of alcohol shall not leave the vehicle,” after receiving a report, F of the police box belonging to the Sungdong Police Station Emba, who was called out, prevented the Defendant, and assaulted F F’s chest at 2 to 3 times with his hand while taking a sudden bath.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on assaulting victims to the part of the statement made by the witness F and G among the fourth protocol of the protocol of interrogation of a partial police suspect against the accused;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The defendant did not have the ability to discern things or make a decision due to drinking, in light of the behavior at the time of committing the crime as to whether he/she has mental or physical disorder under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, the situation at the time of committing the crime

does not seem to have existed in or weak condition.

The reason for sentencing [Scope of Recommendation] There is no person who has the basic sphere (6 to 14 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of sentence] The sentence shall be sentenced as ordered in consideration of the circumstances and contents of the crime of the defendant, the violence of the defendant used, the degree of obstruction of official duties caused by the violence of the defendant, the circumstances after the crime was committed (the police officer who suffered damage has no record of punishment for the same crime), the attitude of the defendant's reflective behavior and the relation of criminal records (the police officer has no record of punishment for the same crime) and all other conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments.