부당해고구제재심판정취소
1. All appeals filed by the Defendant and the Intervenor are dismissed.
2. This shall be caused by the participation in the appeal costs;
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which accepted the first instance, was as follows: “Article 4(1)5 and the proviso of Article 4(1)5” in Part 4 of Part 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance; “Article 4(1)5”; “Defendant’s assertion” in Part 5 3; “2012” in Part 2 of the Table 9 9 as “2013”; “2014” in Part 3 as “2014” in Part 4 under the same Table as “the retirement pay was received after receiving a notice of termination of the employment contract period”; “2012 years” in Part 6 as “2013” in the main sentence of Article 20 of the Civil Procedure Act as “the ground for and after the expiration of the employment contract period”; “The payment of retirement pay was completed from 2014 to 2014” in the same part of the judgment of the court of first instance.
2. In conclusion, the first instance judgment is justifiable, and all appeals filed by the Defendant and the Intervenor joining the Defendant are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.