2. The facts that the judgment defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects on the defendant are favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case was committed on the way of the defendant and his father and wife, demanding that the victim B be punished by a fine of up to 1.5 million won due to the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint injury) against the defendant in relation to this case, and that the victim B was punished by a fine of up to 1.50,00 won, and the defendant was punished by the same kind of crime, and the motive of the crime of this case, the defendant's personality and behavior, family relation, and circumstances after the crime of this case were committed. The defendant's argument that the defendant's punishment of this case was not reasonable, considering the following factors: even if the victim B had expressed the desire for the defendant, the crime of this case was committed in light of the criminal history of this case, the number of victims, the degree of injury, etc., and the victim B did not reach an agreement with the victim. The defendant's motive for the crime of this case, the defendant's personality and behavior, and the circumstances after the crime of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.