2. The judgment of the court below is justified in light of the following circumstances: (a) the defendant recognized the crime of this case as one of the crime of this case; (b) the person with disabilities of grade V with physical disability is not healthy; (c) the period of the crime of this case is merely one day; and (d) the revenue from the crime of this case does not seem to be much high; and (c) the crime of this case is confiscated and confiscated as evidence equivalent to 1.6 million won of the money owned by the defendant who provided or intended to provide the crime of this case; (d) the crime of this case is not guilty; (e) although there was no record of criminal punishment for the same crime; (e) there was no record of criminal punishment for the same crime; (e) there was a history of criminal punishment for the crime of this case; and (e) the court below sentenced to a fine of two million won or more including all kinds of crimes; and (e) other factors of sentencing specified in the records, such as the defendant's age, environment, occupation, family relationship, circumstances leading to the crime of this case, etc.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.