A. 1) The Plaintiff entered into a credit guarantee agreement in 2008 only as the Intervenor joining the Plaintiff’s attorney-at-law (hereinafter “Plaintiff joining the Plaintiff”) around 2008.

(2) On July 18, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a credit guarantee agreement with an intervenor assisting the Plaintiff and received a loan from a financial institution as collateral. (2) On July 18, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a credit guarantee agreement with the intervenor assisting the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the instant credit guarantee agreement”) and received a loan from a stock company C (hereinafter “C”) by taking the credit guarantee form issued by the intervenor assisting the Plaintiff as collateral.

(A) The term “credit guarantee agreement and loan” in this case were to renew the previous credit guarantee agreement and loan as stated in the above paragraph (a). The amount of credit guarantee agreement and credit guarantee agreement as of the date of the credit guarantee agreement and the date of the loan agreement was to be extended to KRW 50,000,000 for general loan loans of KRW 44,400,000 on July 17, 2014. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 24773, Jul. 37, 2013; Presidential Decree No. 17507, Jul. 24, 2014>

B. The Defendant lent money to the Plaintiff and offered the Plaintiff’s security 1) from March 30, 2007 to June 29, 2012, the Defendant loaned money to the Plaintiff several times. From April 2013, the Plaintiff demanded the Plaintiff to provide a security upon delay in repayment of loans and payment of interest. (2) As to the instant real estate on April 25, 2013, the Plaintiff completed the registration of creation of a neighboring mortgage amounting to KRW 160,000,000 with respect to the instant real estate.

(hereinafter the above right to collateral security (hereinafter “instant right to collateral security”) C.

At the time of the establishment of the instant right to collateral security, the Plaintiff’s financial situation 1) existed with positive property equivalent to KRW 290,000,000 at the time of the establishment of the instant right to collateral security. On the other hand, at the time of the establishment of the instant right to collateral security, the Plaintiff’s company was the Plaintiff’s company regarding the instant