However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendants were married and married, and the victims C (the age of 35) who were the substitute engineer after drinking alcohol at the meeting of the alumni association was in her natives.

1. Defendant A

A. Around 00:50 on September 16, 2018, the Defendant: (a) committed assault and assaulting the victim’s back head part and the part of the victim’s back head part and the part of the neck, which were cut off from the train, on the following grounds: (b) around 00:50 on September 16, 2018.

B. Around 01:05 on September 16, 2018, the Defendant of special intimidation: (a) on the street in front of Jeju Island, the Defendant used a stone, which is a dangerous object on the floor despite the dispatch of the police officer for the foregoing reason, and threatened the victim with the risk of death.

C. At around 01:05 on September 16, 2018, the Defendant committed an act of obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) on the street in front of D on September 16, 2018; (b) the police assistant F of the Jeju Western Police Station Estation, a police officer of the Jeju Western Police Station Estation, who received a assault report and attempted to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender; (c) the said F’s chest was sealed by hand; (d) the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender, and the Defendant was fluored by having the f’s chest f’s chest f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s bat;

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on the handling of the case.

2. Defendant B: (a) around 01:05 on September 16, 2018, the Defendant: (b) on the street in front of Jeju Island; (c) on the street in front of Jeju Island, the police officer F.C. 1.

As described in paragraph (1), the body of the above F was assaulted by both hands to prevent arrest of the husband who is the husband from arresting him in the act of committing an offense.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of the case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;