재물손괴
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds of appeal asserts that the defendant, a representative engineer C, was guilty of the facts charged in this case, even though he did not have any fact that the victim caused damage to his cell phone set by breaking his cell phone, and the defendant did not have any fact that the above cell phone set was destroyed by cutting off his cell phone, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts.
2. According to the judgment of the court below and the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, since the defendant was sufficiently admitted that he laid the victim's cell phone on the floor as stated in the facts charged in this case during the dispute with the victim and damaged it, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.