A and C shall be punished by imprisonment for 10 months, by imprisonment for 1 year, and by imprisonment for 8 months, respectively.

(b).

Defendant

C around April 2012, in the H station located in Seoan-gu G in Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-si, entered into a contract with the victim I, J, and K in the relationship of the business to lend the said gas station's business owner's name and to receive KRW 2 million per month.

Defendant

C is the actual owner of the above station. Since C only borrowed the name of the victims and the actual owner of the above station, the price to be received from the above station is the actual owner of the victims and C is in a position to keep the above price for the victims of partnership relations.

Defendant

C around April 2012, Defendant A, B, D, and the victims acquired the “H gas station” and intended to operate it, and made a notarial deed as if there were false claims against Defendant C, Defendant C, and Defendant A as creditors. Based on this, the notarial deed was made as if there were false claims against the Defendant C, and the customers of the H gas station were to pay the said credit card payment to the H gas station by a credit card company. Based on this, the notarial deed was offered to the court for the seizure and collection order after receiving the above payment from the Defendant’s passbook to receive the seizure and collection order and embezzlement the said payment by arbitrarily using it for other purposes.

Nevertheless, around April 17, 2012, the Defendants made a statement to the attorney-at-law in charge of authentication as if Defendant C had been liable for the debt amounting to KRW 120 million against Defendant A, even though Defendant C had not borrowed money from Defendant C at the “M office” office on the second floor of Pyeongtaek-si Lone Building, and at the same time, the attorney-at-law in charge of authentication of promissory notes amounting to KRW 120 million for face value. At that time, the attorney-at-law in charge of authentication, who is unaware of the fact, had the above attorney-at-law, keep it in the said attorney-at-law office, thereby making the original authentic entry of notarial deeds and exercising the original authenticated

After that, Defendant B is in the Dong-dong on June 8, 2012.