2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. Defendant C is a person operating the “E” (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is an insurer of an insurance contract to ensure liability for damages caused by Defendant C’s medical malpractice as the insured.

B. The Plaintiff’s mother, “F” was diagnosed as a fluorculous pain on December 24, 2014, and undergone X-ray CT and MRI inspections, etc., which was conducted by the Defendant Hospital. The Defendant C diagnosed as a pressure frame 2, 3-4, 4-5, and vertebrate 8, 5-5, and fluorculium 1, and carried out spine type 2, which is necessary to alleviate pain on the same day.

C. Even after inverte inverte type, F complained of extreme pains to the parts and the legss of both sides, which were left from hye to hye at the time of walking or stability, Defendant C inspected the cT and MRI on December 31, 2014. As a result of the inspection, the vertebrate c-4 was observed on the vertebrate c-4 on January 2, 2015, and carried out an verteception (hereinafter “instant operation”). < Amended by Act No. 13183, Jan. 2, 2015>

The operation of this case consists of the process of inserting the feasting the feasch by cutting the feasch, cutting the feasch, cutting the feasch in spine by using the operation equipment, such as drying or punching the feasch, and inserting the feasch of the feasch and combining the fasch of the operation.

On January 2, 2015, 11:40, immediately after the instant surgery, F was performed, and F showed symptoms, such as erogenosis, pulmonal difficulty, food, and low-level symptoms, and Defendant C supplied F with oxygen with oxygen, applied cardiopulmonary monitoring, and included barium, and suspended self-harmation (PCA). 2) At around 15:30 of the same day on the same day, F focuseds on snow, thereby causing light gas in a state of light, and Defendant C inspected brain gas in a state of light, and as a result, the inspection was conducted on the left-hand side.