2. In addition to the various circumstances described in the 6th sentence 18 to 7th sentence of the judgment, the court below partially recognized the defendants' favorable circumstances such as the defendant A's failure to repeat the crime on behalf of his family members, and the defendant B's position to support his mother. However, such favorable circumstances appear to have been reflected in the court below's decision. As the court below stated in detail in the 7th sentence 5 to 13th sentence, it is not very good that the crime of this case is committed, and there is a need for strict punishment in light of the defendants' respective criminal records, and other various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing in this case, such as their age, character, conduct, environment, family relations, etc., it is not recognized that the defendant's excessive punishment against the defendants is unfair. Thus, the defendants and their defense counsel' above allegation of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.