상해
The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.
Punishment of the crime
On September 22, 2012, at around 06:10 on September 2, 2012, the Defendant stated that the victim D (the age of 70) did not enter the apartment housing number with respect to the selective distribution items that the Defendant received by the Defendant in the Seo-gu Seoul apartment guard room, and stated the Defendant’s motive as “Chewing feas” in the process of treating the victim’s body as a part of the Defendant’s body, and caused approximately two weeks of the victim’s inside part of the body to be pushed back and elbbow, and caused approximately two weeks of the victim’s injury to the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of a defendant in the first trial record;
1. Legal statement of the witness D;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (30 pages of investigation records);
1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;
1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day);
1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the grounds that Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Sentence (the fact that the victim has agreed smoothly with the victim, the relationship with the victim, the motive and circumstance of the instant case which appears to be a relatively minor and contingent crime, and the Defendant appears to have lived faithfully without any other criminal record than once a fine for this paper is imposed)