When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

【2013 Goun1821】 The Defendant was in front of the central market in Sungnam-si around 05:00 on January 30, 2013, the Defendant did not pay 62,000 won for the taxi when he was on board the taxi and arrived at the destination, even though he did not have the intent and ability to pay for the taxi expenses even if he was on board the taxi and arrived at the destination, he did not pay for the taxi expenses.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired financial benefits equivalent to the above taxi expense.

【2013 high-level 1822】 On December 25, 2012, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by force of approximately 30 minutes, such as 11:30 minutes, where the Defendant, within the “H” restaurant operated by the victim G in Sinh City F, and where the victim seeks to smoke by drinking food and alcohol, i.e., “non-smoking Smoking Smoking Smoking Smoking Smoking........, continuing in the said restaurant, she interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment of the court below]

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. B written statements;

1. A criminal investigation report (general);

1. Receipt 【2013 fixed-1822】

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of investigation reports (general Acts and subordinate statutes);

1. Relevant Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act (Fraud point), Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business), and selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;