A Imprisonment for one year, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 15,000,000 won.

except that this judgment.

Defendant

A was appointed as a managing director on February 8, 2010 from Company B located in Yongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, and was appointed as a representative director on July 8, 2013, and was in charge of production, environment, business, etc., and Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing non-ferrous metal.

1. A person who intends to treat wastes shall comply with the standards and methods prescribed by Presidential Decree, and treat mineral scrap, which is designated wastes, by means of a stabilization disposal, the use of cement and synthetic powder compounds, or by other methods similar thereto, or reclaim them at a managed landfill facility;

A. On January 3, 2011, the Defendant disposed of approximately 30,170 g of luminous waste (AS), which is a place of business generated in the process of recycling (reretotion) at the place of business, at the place of business of the foregoing corporation B, the Defendant without permission in the general waste reclamation site at the place of business. However, the foregoing luminous waste contained at least 1.5 g/liter (AS), which is a toxic substance, in the designated waste standard for designated waste disposal. However, the foregoing luminous waste was a disguised waste at the place of business, which is an electronic data input program of the Ministry of Environment, by falsely inputting the luminous waste into a general waste at the place of business rather than a designated waste, by means of entering the luminous waste at the place of business, as if the luminous waste was a general waste at the place of business. The Defendant transported the waste collection business into the Gyeongcheon-si Special Metropolitan City, Gyeong-si, Inc., 12-65, and had it buried in the general waste reclamation site.

In addition, from around that time to December 31, 2015, the Defendant buried minerals in the general waste reclamation site at the workplace in violation of the processing standards, such as a total of 9,184,210 g of the attached list of crimes (1) in the same manner.

B. The Defendant is a place of business waste generated in the course of the process of refining and recycling (revition) at the place of business of the foregoing corporation B around July 17, 2015.