However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, the defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

Defendants are not victims of narcotics, etc. as Chinese nationals staying in Korea.

1. On November 5, 2016, Defendant A requested Ma-gu to request Ma-gu to request Ma-dong to use the Mebacop (one philopon; hereinafter “Wlopon”), a Mebacopon (one philopon”), a Mecopon (hereinafter “Wlopon”), with consent from G, remitted KRW 50,000 to the Korean bank account of the Mecopon seller who known around the 6th of the same month. On the same day, around 15:30 of the same day, Defendant A sent KRW 50,000 to G to the K bank account of the Mecopon seller who was known to G at around the J community service center located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, where G was stored, and brought about the volume of the mecopon which the said H was stored in the pentular column.

Accordingly, the defendant purchased philophones from the above H.

2. From November 6, 2016, the Defendants jointly committed the crimes of the Defendants: (a) around 19:00, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s dwelling in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K and 503, 2 plastic water lids in plastic water lids; (b) among them, the inhaled mechanism made of Aluminum aluminium as soon as possible at the end of one of them, 0.2g grams in the inhaled sponphones; (c) by inserting them into the sponopic body; and (d) by inserting them into water in plastic water; and (d) the smoke was sponed and inhaled by a method of “friens”, which is a method of rapidly inhaleing it as soon as possible.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to administer philophones.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Investigation report (in response to a request for appraisal), and response to a request for appraisal;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to correspondences requested for appraisal;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Imprisonment with prison labor for each of Articles 60(1)2, 4(1)1, and 2 subparag. 3(b) of the Narcotics Control Act, Articles 60(1)2, 4(1)1, and 2 subparag. 3(b) of the Narcotics Control Act, Articles 60(1)2, and 4(1)1, and 2 subparag. 3(b) of the Narcotics Control Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act.