[criminal history] The Defendant was sentenced to a fine of seven million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (doning under drinking), etc. in the support of the Sugwon method, on May 20, 2010, and on September 2, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of eight million won for the same crime in the same court on September 2, 2014, five times the record of the violation of the Road Traffic Act, including that of a fine of eight million won, and on June 21, 2017, the same court was sentenced to the suspension of the execution for six months as of June 29, 2017, and was sentenced to the suspension of the execution.

[2] On August 17, 2017, the Defendant driven a vehicle of about 5 km from the path near the station in the ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic e

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made in preparation of each letter of apology against D and E;

1. A survey report on actual condition, a report on the verification of alcohol and a report on the detection of a driver with primary alcohol;

1. Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and a copy of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for the mitigation of a small amount of punishment - The defendant recognized all criminal facts. Disadvantageous circumstances - The defendant’s blood alcohol concentration is high - The defendant has been punished several times for the same crime. - The defendant committed this case without being informed of reflectness even during the period of probation. The sentence is ordered in consideration of all the kinds of sentencing conditions revealed in the trial process in each of the above circumstances.