However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 00:15 on November 9, 2019, the Defendant, at the 1112th floor of the toilet, under the influence of alcohol on the ground of fire. However, the Defendant, upon receiving a report on 112 that “a woman under the influence of alcohol cannot enjoy the spirit of a toilet bed on the toilet floor,” she tried to kill a policeman D’s flaps with her flaps, which were caused by his/her hand, while taking a defective bath that he/she tried to cause the Defendant, and she continuously tried to kill a policeman D’s flaps, and the Defendant, who flad the her flaps, continued to kill a policeman D’s flab.

Accordingly, between the defendant and the police officer Eul, the defendant, the defendant, and the defendant, with respect to the slope E, who was called together with the police officer D, pushed the defendant, pushed the breath, walking the spath, walking the spath, walking the spath of the spath, and cutting the spathm with his hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers in charge of handling 112 reported cases due to violence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Photographs photographs of physical damage;

1. Investigation report (at the time of appearance and cases related to witnesses);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the marketing ofCCTV images;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of this case committed within the scope of recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, such as the obstruction of performance of official duties (type 1) in the basic area (one month to one year and six months of imprisonment), shall be sentenced to the defendant's drinking and drinking in the toilet after receiving 112 report, and the defendant is able to take a bath for the defendant, such as taking a bath to the police officer and pushing him/her down his/her body, and taking a bath to him/her, and neglecting the police officer's performance of official duties concerning the handling, etc. of 112 reported cases, as stated in its reasoning.