Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On September 26, 2015, the Defendant embezzled this for the purpose of selling a mobile phone, without taking necessary procedures, such as finding and finding out one of the 4 mobile phones in Samsung Hegel case, which is equivalent to KRW 1,000,00, the market price owned by the victim C (23) who was aboard a taxi operated by the Defendant, but laid down in the taxi.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the statutes on seizure records and the list of seizure lists;

1. Relevant Article 360 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include the following: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime; (b) the victim’s damaged goods were returned; (c) the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime in the past; and (d) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, motive and method of the crime; and (c) the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc. are all considered and sentenced to the same sentence as the disposition.