준강제추행
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two years of the suspension of the execution of six months of imprisonment, two years of protection observation orders, 80 hours of community service order, 40 hours of attendance order for treatment of sexual assault, and 40 hours of attendance order for treatment of sexual assault), too un
2. The crime of this case committed by the victim E and H, who was locked in a soup room, is not less severe, and the victim E is punished against the defendant, and the defendant is punished once by a fine due to a forced indecent act committed by the defendant. However, although the defendant was punished by a fine for one time, the defendant is committed by the defendant, and the victim H does not want the punishment against the defendant, and the defendant did not want the punishment against the defendant, and the defendant has an opportunity to reflect the crime while living in custody for about three months as the case, and considering all the sentencing conditions indicated in the argument of this case, such as the age, sexual behavior, environment, etc. of the defendant, the sentence of the court below is too unjustifiable and it cannot be deemed unfair.
3. Accordingly, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.