A. On June 7, 2014, around 18:30 on June 18, 2014, Defendant A abused the victim’s her parents by reporting that the victim B (here, 36 years of age) is in conflict with his/her parents at the Daejeon Pak-gu X-gu X-ray 488 X-ray 4-distance crosswalk, and by leading the victim’s spath or spath, leading him/her to the right arms.

B. Defendant B used the head of the victim A(the age of 40) to drink against the above act at the same date, time, and place as above 1.3, and used the victim Bbucks to walk twice.

2. The facts charged against the Defendants are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

However, according to each agreement bound in the trial records, the injured party and the Defendants can recognize the fact that they have withdrawn their wish to punish the other party after the prosecution of this case was instituted.

Therefore, in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, all prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.