However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On February 2015, the Defendant constructed a retaining wall with a height of 7.5 meters and length of 98 meters on the land at the time of ignified C, without reporting to the competent authority.

2. On April 2015, the Defendant, without obtaining permission from the competent authority, extended the total floor area of C, 989 square meters, and one warehouse of steel structures, on the land of the Sinsung City.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of a written accusation and statutes governing status photographs;

1. Relevant Article 110 subparagraph 3 of the Building Act, Article 110 subparagraph 3 of the Act on the Selection of Punishment, Article 83 (Occupancy of Building with Unreported Retaining Walls), Article 110 subparagraph 1 of the Building Act, Article 111 (1) (Occupancy of Unauthorized Building) and Article 11 (1) of the Building Act, the selection of imprisonment for each crime;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Execution (the size of facilities illegally extended and constructed is large, the restoration to their original state was not performed, but its mistake is recognized and reflected, and there is no record of criminal punishment until before the crime of this case is committed) or more.