사기등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, from May 10, 201 to May 10, 201, entered into a lease contract with the lessor E, the joint owner of which is KRW 23 million, rent of KRW 120,000,000 per month, and one-year lease contract with the lessee, who was operating the Vice General as the lessee.
The Defendant transferred the operation of the Vice Director General of the DNA Tax Office that had been operated during the period due to health problems, etc., and listened to a talking to the effect that he would no longer extend the lease term from the lessor, but he would no longer extend the lease term, and the Defendant was willing to receive the facility premium by concluding the lease contract whose name was forged in the name of the lessor to F, G, and H.
1. On August 26, 2012, the Defendant forged private document: (a) indicated “E” in the column of the address of the lessor’s address “Seoul Metropolitan City I(A) 102 Dong 102 Dong 501 Dong 501 Dong-gu, Daejeon Metropolitan City; and (b) marked “E” in the name column of the resident registration number column and marked “E” in the name of the Defendant, following the following: (c) on May 10, 2012, the lessor leased the lessee F and the Defendant KRW 23 million to the lessee F and the Defendant for two years from May 10, 2012; and (d) on the real estate lease agreement that the lessor leased the lessee F and the Defendant for KRW 1.2 million from the monthly rent 1.2 million.
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of E, a private document on rights and duties.
2. On August 29, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the office of the Deputy Commissioner of the Korea Customs Service located in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon; (b) delivered to the victims a forged real estate lease agreement under the name of the lessor E, as if it were a document duly formed.
3. The fraud defendant is in the name of the lessor E, the real estate lease agreement and the co-owner, who forged the above paragraph 1 to the victims at the same time and place as the above paragraph 2.