However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 08:14 on April 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) while driving a Fucucoo vehicle in front of the Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul High School 259, the Defendant: (b) was threatening the Victim G on the ground that the vehicle driven by the Defendant prior to its arrival entered the vehicle from the right line to the right line; and (c) the Victim G (38) was kid in front of the Victim G (38). The Defendant Hastststna car owned by the Defendant Company, Inc., which was driving in the first lane, was forced to change the Fucoo vehicle again in the future.

Since then, the Defendant, while starting a vehicle, was driving the vehicle, was aware of the fact that the said vehicle was driving in the same direction as that of the vehicle driving by the Defendant, and had the said vehicle under the influence of the said vehicle under the intention of paying back the vehicle to the said vehicle under the influence of the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant carried a dangerous object, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks. At the same time, the Defendant destroyed the above rocketing vehicles owned by the victimized company, which are worth KRW 54,596.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. A written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on CDs for storage of suspected and damaged vehicles and motion pictures;

1. Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1) (a) and 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order

1. The defendant's assertion that the defendant is driving along a two-lane and has raised the number of animals from the first lane shall be the two-lane truck.