사문서위조등
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal: (a) the Defendant and C discard a letter of assignment during the course of preparation of the said letter of assignment, which did not reach an agreement among the parties; (b) as such, there was no effective assignment of claims between the two parties; and accordingly, (c) prepare a notice of assignment of claims in the name of C on the grounds that the valid assignment of claims occurred; and (d) use it after filing a lawsuit claiming the amount of transfer money and filing an application for auction of corporeal movables with a favorable judgment, constitutes forgery of private documents, events
I would like to say.
Therefore, the judgment of the court below is erroneous in the misconception of facts.
2. The summary of the facts charged in this case was sentenced on March 11, 2009 by the Seoul Central District Court for ten months from imprisonment with prison labor for forging official documents and completed the execution of the sentence on October 30, 2009.
(1) On December 9, 201, the Defendant: (a) at the Stenographic Office in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government, the title “Notice of Claim Transfer”; (b) the transferor “C, Gyeonggi-do Yang-si D”; (c) the transferee “Am-si in Yang-si in Suwon-si in Suwon-si in Suwon-si; (d) 507; (b) the receiver G; and (c) the transferor paid to the transferee the amount of KRW 30 million which the transferor is entitled to receive to receive from G because the transferor is liable to pay to the transferee; and (d) the transferee paid the transferee the amount of KRW 50 million which the transferor is entitled to receive to receive to receive from G. (e., the foregoing notice of claim transfer sent on December 21, 2010 has been sent to the addressee by telephone; and (e) a separate sheet:
1. Each letter is drawn up as follows: “One copy”; “Fresh: C, Gyeonggi-do Yang-si D; and “A” and “W (A) 702 of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; and printed out as a printer.”
As a result, the Defendant, without authority, forged a letter of assignment notification in the name of C, a private document concerning rights and obligations.
(2) The Defendant has 1.1.