2. The lower court, based on the sentencing range and the sentencing guidelines set out in the attached sentencing guidelines, selected the lower limit of the sentencing range (one year to two years for imprisonment).

While considering the crime period of repeated crime and the sentence that is disadvantageous to restitution of damage, the punishment was determined by considering the reflectivity of the defendant as favorable sentencing factors.

There is no change in sentencing elements in the appellate court.

Even if this court re-examines the sentencing factors and other factors of sentencing which are set forth in the sentencing criteria, the determination of the original sentence is inappropriate.

3. The appeal by the defendant is without merit.

The dismissal under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act is dismissed.