2. The judgment of the court below is a confession of all of the crimes. However, in this case, the defendant repeatedly led to a traffic accident while driving a drunk driving, the number of times of the crimes has been granted, and the victim has many times, the past records of punishment for fraud have reached 10 times or more, and there have been several records of the punishment of the crime in the past, and the damage has not been repaid without agreement with the victims of this case. In full view of all other circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, the background and contents leading to the crime in this case, the circumstances leading to the crime in this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed unfair, and the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Article 151 of the Criminal Act in Part 3 of the application of the law at the time of the original adjudication (Article 151 of the Criminal Act shall be deemed to be a clerical error in Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act in light of the fact that "(the point of destruction and damage of property by negligence)" is later indicated, and the facts of the crime of this case and the name of the crime of this case, etc., and the above clerical error in the judgment below shall not