The sentencing of the lower court (one year and two months of imprisonment, and additional collection) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In light of the fact that the defendant made a confession of all of the crimes of this case, and that it seems that the defendant was aiding and abetting the arrest of the upper line in cooperation with the investigation, etc., the court below's sentencing is too unreasonable, considering the motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, and environment, etc., which are favorable to the defendant, or the records that the defendant was sentenced to criminal punishment for a total of five times including the record of being sentenced to one suspended sentence for the same crime of this case, and the amount of the penphonephone that the defendant traded and sold has not reached about 7.3gs, and in light of the sentencing of similar cases of the same kind, the court below seems to have determined the punishment by considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant. In addition, the court below's sentencing is too unreasonable.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition