미성년자의제강제추행
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.
The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant from July 20, 2013 to the same year.
8.2. At the office of the defendant located in Busan-gu Busan-gu, Busan-do, the day-to-day off and off the clothes of the victim E (n, 7 years of age) who is a woman D's father, and the victim was able to talk with the defendant's sexual organ, thereby committing an indecent act against the victim under 13 years of age.
Summary of Evidence
1. Each legal statement of witness E and D;
1. Each video CD with respect to E;
1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;
1. Relevant Articles 305 and 298 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and defense counsel under Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to
1. The summary of the assertion is that the defendant did not commit an indecent act against the victim as in the above facts constituting an offense, and the victim's statement is inconsistent or ambiguous, and thus, cannot be trusted.
2. Determination
A. In determining the credibility of a statement by a child victimized by sexual indecent act, submitted as evidence, the child’s age is how much the child’s age is; how much the child’s statement was made after the occurrence of the case; how much the child was made after the occurrence of the case; how the guardian or investigator who first heard the damage to the child in the course of the occurrence of the case until the statement was made; information that is not true for the child; or inducing a specific answer through repeated newspapers, etc.; whether there is no repeated question that may be committed by the questioner at the time of the statement; whether the statement was affected by another child’s statement; whether the statement was made by the interviewer; whether the child’s statement was affected by the interviewer; whether the statement was made by the interviewer; and whether it was made by the court.