2. Although each of the crimes of this case was committed in favor of the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized and divided, and it is against himself. However, each of the crimes of this case was committed by the defendant by deceiving the victim by active means, and received a total of KRW 19.4 million from the victim, and the victim received money and valuables equivalent to KRW 80 million from the victim by threatening female employees and sexual traffic as if the defendant informed them to investigation agencies, etc., in light of the law and the degree of damage, etc., the crime was not committed in bad quality, because the defendant was unable to pay damages to the defendant properly up to the trial, and there was a record of punishment for the same crime of this case. In addition, considering the motive and circumstance leading up to each of the crimes of this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior after the crime, environment, etc., the sentencing of the court below is too unfair. Thus, the above defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.