2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant had a same criminal history over several occasions; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime according to the larceny; and (c) the Defendant did not reach an agreement between the Defendant and the victims; (b) the Defendant was a relatively old age having become an adult prior to the failure to commit the instant crime; and (c) the Defendant’s mistake was divided into one another; and (d) the Defendant’s character and conduct, family relation, environment, occupation, circumstance and details leading to the instant crime; and (e) circumstances leading to the sentencing indicated in the record, such as the circumstances after committing the instant crime, etc., it cannot be deemed unfair since the sentence of the lower judgment is too un

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.