If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

1. On June 21, 2015, from around 17:00 to around 18:00, the Defendant: (a) was entering the Sungnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Seoul Special Metropolitan City”) D Do D Do D Donbbb, which was under the influence of alcohol, and obstructed the victim’s accommodation business for about one hour by taking into account the following: (b) the Defendant’s Donb Donb, “if it appears that it would be possible to report the C Donb, it should be reported the same year as the opening of the report year, and where the same year as the opening of the report year, it should be reported; (c) the Defendant took a bath that the Donb Donb Don was abandoned; and (d) the Defendant’s Donb Don Don Don Don Don.”

2. The Defendant, from around 08:00 to around 09:30 on June 22, 2015, entered the Kabter where the victim C was a business owner, who was under cleaning at a place of cleaning, after being under the influence of alcohol at the D's house located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, and obstructed the victim's business of lodging for about 1 hour and 30 minutes by force, such as: (a) the victim C, who was a business owner, who was under cleaning at the place of cleaning.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.