When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who has worked as an agent in the “E” located inside the Gwangju Mine-gu D University, and the victim B (a person, a person, and 20 years of age) is a person who has worked as an employee in the above company.

On July 14, 2018, the Defendant: (a) moved to the back seat of the driver’s seat of the FF car owned by the Defendant, which the Defendant driven with the victim, after holding a meeting with the victim, etc. on the restaurant in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju, etc.; and (b) moved to the back seat of the driver’s seat of the FF car owned by the Defendant, with the victim, the Defendant raised the loss on the part of the victim’s bucks; and (c) 2 and 3 times the losses of the

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the defendant and his defense counsel did not commit an indecent act against the victim as stated in the facts charged in the judgment of the defendant, as the defendant's statement B (tentative name), G's each legal statement B (tentative name), and each police statement B (tentative name) of G.

On the other hand, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court: (i) the victim made a consistent statement from an investigative agency to this court on a consistent basis with the main part of the crime as indicated in the judgment, and on the situation before and after it; (ii) the victim made a statement by clearly distinguishing from the part that his memory is not accurate and the part that his memory remains, and (iii) the victim made a statement about the victim’s speech and behavior before and after the crime of this case; (iv) the content of the type of force used by the Defendant in the course of committing an indecent act against the victim; and (v) the victim’s statement about the victim’s emotional or emotional distress. The victim’s statement as above includes the content of the statement to the extent that it is difficult for the victim to maintain without direct experience, and is also inconsistent with the empirical rule.