A. (1) AD completed the registration of ownership transfer on December 5, 2005 due to sale and purchase on November 11, 2003.

B. On April 13, 2009, the Plaintiff completed the registration of establishment of a new mortgage on D, the maximum debt amount of which was KRW 165.1 million, and the debtor completed the registration of establishment of a new mortgage on January 31, 2011 on the ground of the contract acquisition on April 13, 2009. The registration of alteration with E made by the debtor on January 31, 2011 was completed on the ground of the contract acquisition.

(hereinafter “instant collateral security”). B.

The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against D, F, etc. with the Seoul Central District Court 201Gadan42027, and D and F, on October 8, 2012, “D and F, jointly and severally, shall pay to the Plaintiff 96,592,313 won, and 96,151,259 won among them, 14% per annum from August 3, 2011 to November 2, 201, and 20% per annum from the following day to the date of full payment” was written as the recognition and recognition protocol of the Plaintiff’s claim.

(hereinafter “Protocol of Recognition and Recognition”) C.

(1) On March 28, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for a compulsory auction on the instant real estate with Suwon District Court Branch B to cover the amount of credit based on the letter of recognition and recognition of D, and the said court rendered a decision to commence the auction on March 28, 2013, and the registration of the decision to commence the auction was completed on March 28, 2013.

(hereinafter “instant case of compulsory auction”). On the other hand, with respect to the instant case of compulsory auction, the court of execution designated the completion period to demand a distribution as July 3, 2013, and publicly announced it.

Luxembourg The provisional attachment registration (the claimed amount: 186,909,589) was completed on May 1, 2013, upon the filing of an application for provisional attachment with respect to the instant real estate with the Suwon District Court 2013Kadan738, in order to preserve the loan claims against D.

(hereinafter referred to as “the provisional seizure of this case”). The defendant shall be the defendant.