However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On April 4, 2015, at around 03:35, the Defendant 112 reported that he fights in front of the convenience store located in Geum-gu, Busan, the Busan, the Busan, the Busan, the Police Station D District D District Sticking Station E, and the Inspector F, who was called out after having received a 112 report to listen to the developments of assault, and, without any justifiable reason, assaulted the chest of the police station E by pushingping the fat, killing the fat, and neglecting the Defendant’s act, and interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties in relation to the report by the police officer on the fath and f.

2. At around 03:50 on April 4, 2015, the Defendant expressed a desire to the police officer who works after deducting one hand from the wall that he was arrested as a flagrant offender as stated in paragraph (1) at the D District District Zone, that he would be able to say, “I am unable to wear the wall or this son? I am unable to do so,” and the police officer who tried to appeal and restrain the Defendant from committing violence, desireing the Defendant’s conduct of disturbance, and neglecting the police officer’s proper performance of the duty to report and handle the police officer’s 112 weeks of treatment at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement of the E, F, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (Nos. 4, 6, and 8 of the evidence list);

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Between the crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties as stated in Articles 40 and 50(1) of the Criminal Act, which are crimes of ordinary concurrences and choice of punishment types, is more severe.