2. The crime of this case is deemed to be quasi-rape of the victim, regardless of the defendant's drinking together, and the nature of the crime is poor.

With regard to the instant crime, the victim seems to have suffered a considerable sense of sexual humiliation.

up to the appellate trial, the defendant did not receive a letter from the injured party, and the injured party wanted to make a strict punishment against the defendant.

However, in the appellate trial, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects it.

The defendant has no history of criminal punishment.

As new data on sentencing have not been submitted in the appellate court, there is no particular change in sentencing conditions compared with those of the lower court.

Considering the various sentencing factors revealed in the appellate trial, the lower court’s sentence is too heavy to the extent that it exceeds the reasonable scope of discretion of the court.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.