However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Defluence;

A. On September 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) held in Daejeon Dong-dong, Daejeon; (b) on September 12, 2016, the Defendant asked the victim E (V, 48 years old) for the price of nutrition; and (c) on the ground that the victim may affix the bar code, the Defendant’s “Isk if Isk for Isk for Isk for Isk for Isk for such an infinite weather, Isk for palmatosis.”

물건 값도 몰라서 찍어 봐야 아냐, 썅 년 아 "라고 큰소리로 말하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, stated that the Victim F ( South, 30 years of age) who was waiting for calculation in the Defendant following the Defendant, “Is the Plaintiff’s desire to do so only, and Is the Defendant as soon as possible,” and that “Is the Defendant’s hearing by an unspecified number of customers.”

place of origin;

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring to the large soften, “Woo 1.......”

2. In that the Defendant: (a) at the same time as the victim G manages, the Defendant obstructed the operation of Mat by force for about 40 minutes, such as: (b) the Defendant, like the preceding paragraph, had the relevant crew and the customer take a large bath, etc.; and (c) let the customer waiting for the calculation return to the account; and (d) had the damaged person interfere with the operation of Mat for about 40 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E, F, and G;

1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 313 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: Determination of a sentence that confessions and reflects the fact that the nature of the crime is not good in light of the content of the crime, that there is no agreement with the victims, and that there are three favorable circumstances in favor of the victims of violent crimes: the above.