국민체육진흥법위반(도박등)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
No one shall gambling using an act of offering property or property benefits to persons who win the result of issuing (including issuing through an information and communications network) sports promotion voting rights or things similar thereto by a person who is not an entrusted business entity and the Korea Sports Promotion Foundation for the Olympic Games or a person who is not an entrusted business entity.
Nevertheless, the defendant from March 20, 2016 to the same year.
7. up to 15. up to 15. Gambling site (www.beat2.com) deposited 36,003,000 won in total over 94 times in a new bank account (100-3115-1395) in the name of a host (state) in his own national bank account (B) as shown in the list of crimes attached hereto, and used a gambling method that loses the printing amount at the expense of participating in a domestic and overseas sports competition if it is impossible to receive a refund in accordance with the dividend rate.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;
1. 도박사이트 입금계좌 스크린 샷
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on trading of an account recipient;
1. Article 48 subparagraph 3 of the National Sports Promotion Act, Article 26 (1) of the same Act, and Article 26 of the same Act, inclusive of the relevant laws and punishment for the crime;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The sentencing factors of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, including the fact that the defendant 94 times gambling the Internet and that the total amount used for gambling is about 36 million won, and the defendant has no record of being punished for the same crime, and that he reflects his mistake, shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the favorable sentencing factors such as the fact that the defendant's reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects his mistake.