정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Criminal facts
The Defendant is a person who worked as a student student student student student student student in Suwon-si building B and D private teaching institutes operated by the victim C on the second floor from October 2015 to August 2017.
1. On March 30, 2017, at a place where it is impossible to identify a place where it is about 22:25 on March 30, 2017, the Defendant connects the Defendant’s E account to the Defendant’s account and re-surfed the flusium, as the flusium was flusium, on the bulletin board. There is no flusium repeated repeated, but even if the flusium, such as the president, did not get divorced.
I think, even once a day, a set of time is changed.
“Publicly insulting the victim C by posting a letter “.”
2. On March 30, 2017, at a place where the location of around 23:07 is unknown, the Defendant connects the Defendant E to the place where the Defendant’s location is unknown, and “Irre the future flag, the glaf, the glaf, the glaf, the glaf, the glaf, the glaf, and the glaf, are too many people.
B. The Defendant also posted comments on the comments that he may know about, and thereby publicly insulting, the Victim C.
3. On August 10, 2017, the Defendant posted the “F” to “F to transfer to one another,” at a place where no location is unknown, and publicly insulted C by publicly insulting the victim by putting the “F” on “F, which slanders that have been cruel in the course of education or the head of a larger private teaching institute.”
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. The legal statement of the witness C;
1. 1) The screen of the closure and the facts constituting the crime 4) the closure screen;
1. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by each evidence in the judgment, ① the Defendant’s E account is an open account for those who are linked to friendship, ② the Defendant’s writing is sufficiently known that the Defendant prepared a letter by referring to the president of the private teaching institute, ③ even if the notice is posted daily due to the characteristics of SNS, people connected to the Defendant’s account can recognize the contents of the writing, and actually carried out comments on the Defendant’s notice.