2. According to each evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, including the police statements of the victim E, it is recognized that the Defendant’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her son

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, it is insufficient to recognize that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone was sufficient to acknowledge that the defendant was her her her her son with the intent to force the victim to commit an indecent act, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

① The Defendant was in a significant drinking state at the main point of the instant case. While the victim was expected to talk with the chief executive officer of the main store, the victim said that her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her b

② Accordingly, the chief executive officer of the main place of business who the victim saw the victim to be the representative of the main place of business. The chief executive officer of the main place of business referred to the Defendant “I promptly know the Defendant that the Defendant is the person working in this context.”

I swear.

The term “assumed” used in the context of this case.

(3) That the victim did not assault or threaten the defendant at an investigative agency.

A statement was made by the defendant to the effect that the defendant was her her mar at the time when her mar was her her mar, and that the witness F at the time made a statement to the effect that the defendant was her mard with the victim's mar.

④ 피고인은 수사기관에서 이 법정에 이르기까지 일관되게 피해 자를 주점 종업원으로 착각하여 화장실 위치를 물었는데 피해자가 이를 듣지 못한 것 같아 피해자의 허리 부위를 1번 툭 쳤을 뿐이라고 주장하고,...