except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On the other hand, when receiving an order to install an Internet telephone, the Defendant received a separate fee from KT which is a company with the establishment of the Internet telephone, and used an application for subscription to the Internet phone under the name of another person, a written consent to use personal information, forgery and use of power to borrow money from the victim C.

1. The Defendant: (a) around June 2014, at the office E office located in Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (b) made an infinite employee enter customer information column “F name, G, representative name H, business registration number I, K, account number page, and 300 of the filing number in Songpa-gu, Songpa-gu, Seoul; (c) marked in the customer information column “F name, G, representative name H, business registration number I, and K, account number page page, and 300 of the filing number; (d) marked in advance on the written consent for the use of personal information; (d) marked the F seal “F” three times using the stamp; and (e) made the applicant’s name, resident registration number, address, and Songpa-gu’s signature in the proxy form; and (e) kept the FF’s signature in advance and sealed it; and (e) made the applicant’s signature in the proxy form as above.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of application for subscription to Internet telephone in the name of F, a private document on rights and obligations, one letter of consent to use personal information, one letter of delegation in the name of F, and one letter of delegation in the name of L respectively.

2. Around June 2014, the Defendant: (a) held a forged Internet telephone subscription application, personal information utilization consent, and power of attorney respectively with respect to a forged Internet apartment store in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, as described in paragraph (1).

3. The accused of fraud shall be the victim C with the forged document, as described in paragraph (2), at the time and place.