When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2018. 5. 07. 02:30 경부터 04:30 경까지 부천시 B에 있는 피해자 C(58 세, 여) 가 관리하는 "D" 음식점 내에서 피고인의 개인적 문제로 화가 나서 " 아 씨 발 좃 같네

The term "I am and brut it, so that other customers get out of it, and customers who want to enter were able to get out of it, such as the match.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant operation by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on internal investigation;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the order of provisional payment: The crime of this case seems to have led to the fear that the victim and the customer were sworn.

The crime of this case has not been committed more than once and not more than two months have passed since the record of punishment for the same crime was committed.

The favorable circumstances: The mistake is recognized and reflected.

The agreement was reached with the victim.

In addition, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the health conditions of the defendant, motive and background of the crime, means of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. and various sentencing conditions shown in the theory of change.