A. On July 23, 2010, at around 21:35, the Plaintiff’s liability for damages occurred due to driving of a taxi vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) affiliated with the mutual aid project operated by the Defendant and indicating a non-protected left-hand turn at the right-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-on at the right-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-on at the right-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-on at the right-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-on from the front side of the Plaintiff’s driver’s seat (hereinafter “instant accident”), according to the following facts, the Plaintiff is not disputed between the parties to the accident, or the Plaintiff is liable for damages including the number and image number of the Plaintiff’s remaining-hand 2, 3, and 14 through 14, as a whole.

B. In full view of the background leading up to the instant accident, including the above evidence, as well as the images of Eul evidence No. 2 and the CD verification result of this court, the defendant vehicle's entry into the intersection at the point of the accident, and attempted to make a left-hand turn at a speed of 2-30km/h from the opposite lane between the vehicle and the vehicle temporarily stopped at a speed of 2-30km/h., while the defendant vehicle attempted to turn to the left-hand turn at a speed of 2-30km from the opposite lane, it is recognized that the plaintiff's vehicle going to the right-hand turn from the opposite lane without turning to the headlight. As such, the defendant vehicle, who makes a left-hand turn, should turn to the left-hand turn so as not to interfere with the vehicle from the opposite direction (see attached Table 6 of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act).