A shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won, and by imprisonment of 10 months for each of the defendants B and C.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

[2013 Highest 1771] Defendant A was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of six months of imprisonment for fraud in the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on January 24, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 1, 2013.

The Defendants, as if they were to work as a multiple female employee, had the multiple owners deceiving them to receive prepaid payments and take them into account.

Defendant A, around August 10, 2012, in the “IC” of the operation of the Victim H in Hong-gun, Hongsung-gun G, Defendant A, “The victim works as an employee of the State with the advance payment, and introduces two other ICs to the victim,” and Defendant C and Defendant B found the victim in the said multi-face on August 13, 2012, thereby doing so as to be a female employee if the victim would be the principal employee.

The Defendants, despite the absence of the intent or ability to work as an employee even after receiving the advance payment from the victim, deceiving the victim, and around that time, Defendant A received KRW 3.2 million from the victim, Defendant C, and Defendant B received KRW 1.5 million in total and received KRW 6.2 million in collusion.

[2013 Highest 2890] Criminal facts of the 2013 Highest 3832 case, “Defendant B” was committed in collusion by Defendant C and B, and stated in this part that the separate indictment was stated.

Defendant

C and B, as if they were to work as a female employee, they had the intention to acquire prepaid money by deceiving multi-party business owners.

Accordingly, Defendant C and B stated, around September 12, 2012, that “I will work as an employee if I would work with one million won in advance payment.”

However, the fact was that there was no intention to work as a female head in the above multilateral.

Defendant

C and B were delivered from the victim, namely, one million won in cash in advance, and the defendant B received 300,000 won in cash in terms of living expenses, respectively.

In this respect.