손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion
A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a construction contract (hereinafter “instant construction contract”) with the Defendant from June 16, 2015 to August 15, 2015 (hereinafter “instant construction contract”) with the contractor, the contractor, the construction amount of KRW 209,00,000 (including value-added tax), and with the contents of the construction work among the C works in the Gyeongnam Development Group, with the steel frame, steel reinforced concrete/markets, and Changho-si/Sho-si, and the construction period from June 16, 2015 to August 15.
B. However, the defendant unilaterally terminated the construction contract of this case, and in relation to the termination of the construction contract, there are causes attributable to the defendant as follows.
① Although the Defendant informed the Plaintiff of the error in the survey line and the construction location, the Defendant transferred its responsibility to the Plaintiff and refused to pay the price for the change.
(2) Although the Defendant paid the steel framed materials supplied by a third party at the construction site, it did not pay them.
(3) The Defendant refused to settle the additional construction cost due to the increase in the construction area required by the Defendant.
(hereinafter referred to as “third cause for liability”). (c)
Therefore, as the instant construction contract was reversed due to the Defendant’s fault, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 12,769,000 (30,269,000 which the Plaintiff invested in the construction site of this case - the construction cost of KRW 17,50,00) and damages for delay.
2. Determination
A. The fact that the instant construction contract was concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant; however, the Plaintiff failed to complete the construction by the deadline for completion stipulated in the instant construction contract; and the Defendant’s notification of the termination of the construction contract on September 2, 2015 to the effect that the instant construction contract was terminated does not conflict between the parties.
B. The plaintiff's damage compensation.