When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

1. On May 21, 2016, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) under the influence of alcohol in the District C District District of the Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, Seoul, the Police Station C, which was located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, and (b) took a bruptous and sculous view, such as “bruing death,” and (c) engaging in a bruptous and disorderly speech or behavior at a public office.

2. When the Defendant was enjoying in a parking zone for persons with disabilities in front of the above annexed police station C District, the Defendant was at the time of the above D’s head with a right hand, i.e., having a view to returning home from D, who was a patrolman belonging to the annexed police station C District, in order to return home from D.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of the lives and bodies of the police officers and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The statement made by the police in the protocol of the statement made by the police against E (the defendant's use of the disturbance against the police officer is consistent, but there is credibility in the above statement made by E, although the defendant did not assault the police officer.

[Judgment] Application of the statute

1. Relevant provisions of the Punishment Act concerning the facts constituting the crime, Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of disturbance, the choice of fines by the government offices), and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties, and the choice of punishment by imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 3 and 50 of the same Act, which increases concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act include the confession of the crime of this case and the fact that it appears that the defendant committed the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant seems to have been punished for the same kind of crime, the fact that there is no past record for the defendant to be punished for the same crime, and the degree of interference with official duties caused by the assault of this case and the crime of this case, etc., the punishment as set forth in the Disposition above shall be determined