Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On August 30, 2019, at around 08:38, the Defendant: (a) confirmed that C temporarily protects the Mameromine on the “Comprehensive Recreation Center,” and (b) sent C a phone call to C a photograph of the same son as the photograph published in the said text. The Defendant’s name was brupted and brupted that “The Mamergical dog is a stronger, and the Mamergical dog is a little.” The strong name was brupted and bruged twice, and sent the same photo of the magian as the photograph posted in the said article.

However, the fact was that the defendant was managed by the defendant, or that the defendant was not strong, and that the victim D was lost.

On August 31, 2019, at around 12:00 on August 31, 2019, the Defendant deceptioned C as above, and received approximately KRW 800,000,00 from C, in the front of the Chuncheon-do Peace-ro 1 and the Chuncheon-ro, the market price of which was approximately KRW 80,000,00 from C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Written statements and written complaints (No. 2020 petition3);

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that C had no legal intent to commit fraud in the form of fraud because it is apparent that C has no status or legal authority to dispose of the victim's loss by force, and considering the attitude of B, who is the actual owner, it is recognized that B has renounced ownership. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, the defendant had the record of having been investigated as to the above abandonment and having been subject to non-prosecution disposition after being subject to the investigation as to the charge of larceny, and even though he had been aware of the identity of the owner of the above abandonment, he did not inform C of the fact that he had discovered the abandonment of the victim.