도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
A. At around 00:40 on March 4, 2013, the Defendant driven a B Sti-type car under the influence of alcohol content 0.155% from the section of approximately 700 meters from the road front of the Dobong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City access Zone “KFC” to the road front of the same 1627-1.
B. Around 00:40 on March 4, 2013, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.155%, and the Defendant driven the said SP-type car and driven the said SP-type car at a three-lane speed between the four-lanes in the direction of the flow of Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, at the end of the fourth-lane.
A driver of a motor vehicle shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle, shall not drive the motor vehicle at such speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and injury on others, depending on the traffic conditions of the road and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle, and has a duty of care to ensure that the driver of the motor vehicle is obliged to properly report the traffic situation on his/her front
Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol as above, failed to continue to stop in the same direction, went into conflict with the right side of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle owned by the victim C, which was parked in the same direction four-lane.
The Defendant, while continuing to be parked on the road 1627-1, Youngcheon-dong 1627-1, in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, will see the FST5 vehicle fronter owned by the victim E to the fronter of the driver’s vehicle. After the victim’s vehicle E was pushed back, the part of the left-hand side of the victim’s HK car owned by the victim G, which was parked after the victim’s vehicle was pushed back, conflicts with the victim’s HK car left-hand side, and the part of the victim’s private taxi owned by the victim C, which was driven by the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle, conflicts with the part of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the driver’s vehicle.